Freedman & Gopalan Solicitors are happy to report another successful Court decision in favour of one of our clients, Australian National Car Parks (ANCP).

After what appeared to be extensive lobbying to the Department of Fair Trading about the business operations of our client ANCP, the Department issued charges against ANCP alleging undue harassment for pursuing unpaid payment notices levied against the drivers of vehicles on properties managed by our client. We were familiar with the recovery processes undertaken by ANCP and never considered that those processes were either undue harassment or in any other way inappropriate.

Mr Peter Silver, Senior Counsel briefed to appear on behalf of ANCP made submissions to the presiding Judge demonstrating the hopelessness of the Prosecution’s case. Following his submissions, the Judge recommended negotiations. The presiding Judge also expressed her concern as to how the charges could ever be proven against ANCP. It was recommended that the parties engage in some discussion in relation to payment of legal costs. In accordance with Her Honour’s directions, ANCP did enter into negotiations with the Department’s representatives which led to the charges being formally withdrawn and the Department arguing to meet with representatives of ANCP to discuss dealing with consumer complaints and a general review of the business operation.

We are pleased that our initial advice was proven correct and we were able to provide sound legal advice and assistance to our client.

Previous news report:

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/car-park-company-crossed-the-line-court-told-20130904-2t5lq.html

F&G’s current media statement:

When F&G were asked to comment in relation to the Court proceedings, we said:

“We were initially surprised that any charges were laid against our client, ANCP. The withdrawal of those charges was not only gratifying, but also appropriate. After having spent significant time in understanding our client’s business model and methods of operation, it was clear that ANCP undertakes a legitimate business enterprise which also assists its customers in managing their property portfolio.

Not only were we able to negotiate the withdrawal of charges against our client but have been able to enter into arrangements to meet with the Department of Fair Trading to ensure that an even better processes for dispute resolution are negotiated and our clients overall business process receives the necessary approval and endorsement from the Department. We consider the outcome to be a positive result for all concerned.”

New laws and amendments have been introduced.  Make sure you keep up to date with these changes.

Bankruptcy Law: Important name change for ITSA

As of 15 August 2013, the Insolvency and Trustee Service of Australia (ITSA) has changed its name to Australian Financial Security Authority (AFSA).

Estate Law: The law says multiple spouses - be wary

The changing dynamics and structures of the family unit and the increase in multiple spouses and domestic partners has led to changes in the Succession Amendment (Intestacy) Act 2009 (“the Act”) which deals with the distribution of a deceased persons assets in circumstances where there is no Will.

Employment Law: A post on social media (LinkedIn or facebook) will it cost your job?

Do you hold a belief that no matter what you post on social media (whether Linkedin or Facebook) that it would be a private matter and not concerning your employer? You might be of that belief, however, the Fair Work Commission has upheld an architectural companies position to dismiss an employee after it was found that he had attempted to approach his employer’s clients through the social media’s network, Linkedin (so that he could promote and expand his own business).

Bradford Pedley v IPMS Pty Ltd t/as Packvonhartel (2013) FWC 4282 looked into the issued when an employee was pursuing, out of work activities, which were against employees duties to his employer

Family Law: The times - they are a-changing: can an affair be legally considered a de facto relationship?

Relationships are complicated generally and when the Law becomes involved further complications arise. Up until some years ago, the Law treated marital relations and de facto relations differently. Family Law Act gave exclusive jurisdiction to the Family Court and Federal Circuits Court to effectively treat de facto relationships on the same basis that marital relationships are being dealt with. At the time that these amendments were being contemplated, concern was voiced by many Practitioners as to the broad description of what constituted a de facto relationship. This issue was recently considered by the Family Court in a matter of Jonah & White. In this Application the Applicant sought a division of property from the Respondent claiming they were in a de facto relationship. The Court was asked to declare the existence of the de facto relationship

Employment Law - Unfair dismissal - your rights

Under the Fair Work Act a person has been unfairly dismissed,

• if the dismissal was harsh, unjust or unreasonable and;
• Was not consistent with the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code and/or
• was not a case of genuine redundancy.

Read more (Reporter September 2013 Issue)